The dangerous step isn’t generating conviction.
It is translating conviction into an irreversible action.
An agent can be entirely correct about an event and still select the wrong financial instrument to express it: the wrong deadline, the wrong threshold, a market that only covers one narrow occurrence instead of the window the thesis actually describes. Being right about the world and being right about the contract are two different claims. Klyr only makes the second one.
Klyr is not a forecasting model, and it does not claim to know whether a thesis will come true. It answers a narrower, checkable question: does this specific market, as written, actually represent this specific belief? If the answer is unclear, Klyr says so rather than resolving the uncertainty for you.
Klyr is the validation layer between agent conviction and economic execution.
The model may propose the position. Klyr decides whether the position is valid.
The exact operational sequence, and how each check works, is covered on the how it works page.